Connected investigations
Organise related findings while preserving the individual events behind them.
FINANCIAL-CRIME SOLUTIONSCase & investigation management
Case & investigation management
Connected investigations. Every event traceable.
Bring financial-crime findings, evidence and review decisions into a coordinated investigation workflow.
What this solution does
Financial-crime investigations often involve multiple alerts, teams and supporting records. Case and investigation management provides an organised workspace for bringing those elements together while preserving the events behind each concern. It supports clear responsibilities and a reasoned record of how an investigation progressed and concluded.
The challenge
Repeated events should not create disconnected investigations. At the same time, grouping must preserve each occurrence, authority and material evidence change.
What your teams can do
Clear responsibilities
Support review ownership, hand-offs and escalation across teams.
Decision history
Maintain an understandable record of findings, reviewer conclusions and supporting reasons.
Coordinated case work
Help teams understand the current investigation, outstanding tasks and responsibility for follow-up. Keep context available across hand-offs.
Evidence and reasoning
Bring relevant evidence together with analyst observations and conclusions. Preserve the difference between a system finding and the judgement made about it.
Changed circumstances
Support review when new information affects a previously assessed concern. Keep the earlier investigation context understandable.
Data quality and review evidence
These capabilities are included within this product’s agreed scope.
Data quality & record context
Identify incomplete case information and conflicting evidence references. Preserve individual events when related concerns are organised into one investigation.
Audit & compliance evidence
Maintain investigation ownership, review actions, evidence references and the chronology of decisions. Preserve the distinction between a finding and an authorised conclusion.
Who it helps
- Financial-crime investigation teams
- Case supervisors and approvers
- Quality assurance and oversight teams
Banking use cases
Illustrative situations showing how the solution can support a bank’s work; these are not customer case studies.
Several related alerts
Multiple alerts concern related activity but arrive at different times. Investigators can coordinate their review while keeping every underlying event identifiable.
An investigation hand-off
A case moves from an analyst to a specialist team. The receiving team can understand the evidence gathered, unanswered questions and actions already taken.
Value for your institution
For analysts
Less effort reconstructing the history of an investigation after a hand-off.
For supervisors
Clearer visibility of ownership, outstanding work and the reasons supporting decisions.
For oversight
An organised record of investigation activity and reviewed conclusions.
Common questions
Must an institution replace its existing approval portal?
No. An engagement can be scoped around the institution’s existing review environment and the responsibilities it wishes to retain.
Are related transactions merged into one transaction?
No. Investigative grouping should preserve the individual events and their distinct identities.
Shape the right engagement
Discuss your investigation process, team responsibilities and existing approval environment.
Define the relevant business scope, permitted information, review responsibilities and practical acceptance needs with your institution. This creates a clear basis for discussing delivery and support.